Labor/union history tainted by racism

Photo courtesy of Workers World. “Black UAW workers on strike”

This article first published 9/6/21 by the Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder https://spokesman-recorder.com/2021/09/06/labor-union-history-tainted-by-racism/

UAW toed the color line to its own detriment

Never have I been so proud to be my father’s son than at his wake on a sunless, snowy midwinter afternoon 10 years ago. According to family lore, my father was unemployed on the day I was born in 1965 but found work at the Indianapolis Chrysler Foundry weeks later.

As my father told the story, he walked into the plant on his first day and saw a slave ship of Black men shackled—if only figuratively—to a soul-killing, back-breaking assembly line, and decided on the spot that was not the life for him.

And so he would go on to enroll in the training courses for a millwright’s position, eventually becoming the first African American skilled tradesman at Indianapolis Chrysler. I have often boasted of my father’s initiative in challenging the White bosses’ notion of what was rightfully his.

But as his Black co-workers filed by at the funeral home that wintry day, it was his grace that they spoke of, recalling the many times my old man encouraged them to pursue the technical bona fides that would allow them to work in the higher-paying, and less physically demanding skilled trade positions.

“Now look, n—-,” one of his coworkers recalled my father saying with a broad grin on his face, “if I can do it, you know they’ll let anybody do it.”

But not really. My old man’s self-deprecating humor notwithstanding, the top jobs at Chrysler were, at the time of my father’s hiring, reserved for the Whitest and not the best—thanks to a clause in the union contract that locked Black workers in de facto segregated job classifications.

According to the labor historian Herbert Hill, this clause, negotiated by the United Auto Workers and Detroit’s Big Three auto manufacturers—General Motors, the Ford Motor Company, and Chrysler—was in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.

By the time my father landed a job at Chrysler, African Americans accounted for seven-tenths of one percent of the skilled labor force at the Big Three’s auto plants, while making up 42.3% of the entire workforce, according to data compiled by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

Labor Day’s annual homage to the American worker is as good an opportunity as any to reflect on both the towering triumphs and embarrassing failures of a trade union movement that has time and time again betrayed its own membership by agreeing to backroom deals that aid and abet corporations in discriminating against the Black rank-and-file.

Beginning in 1935 at the nadir of the Great Depression when the Congress of Industrial Organizations, or CIO, rejected the American Federation of Labor’s tradition of segregated locals and accelerating with the country’s entry into World War II, labor unions became a force to be reckoned with in American public life. By 1975, more than one in three workers belonged to a union, and employees pocketed more than half of Gross Domestic Product, an all-time high.

But big business planted the seeds for its comeback by pushing Congress to override President Truman’s veto and pass the Taft-Hartley bill in 1947, limiting employees’ ability to strike, and perhaps most importantly, requiring labor leaders to oust the most militant workers, Communists, and African Americans.

Among the questions put to Blacks suspected of collaborating with Reds (Communists) were: “Have you ever had dinner with a mixed group?” and “Have you ever danced with a White girl?”

White employees were asked whether they had ever entertained Blacks as guests and White witnesses were asked, “Have you had any conversations that would lead you to believe [the accused) is rather advanced in his thinking on racial matters?”

No labor leader expelled progressive unionists with more enthusiasm than the UAW’s Walter Reuther, who would be the only non-Black invited to speak at the March on Washington in 1963.

In an effort to consolidate Reuther’s base of Polish, Hungarian, German, and other White ethnics, the UAW and the National Maritime Union combined to purge 11 unions, representing nearly a million workers, from the CIO, over a two-year period beginning in 1949. When Black autoworkers demanded an African American union vice president as was customary in CIO unions, Reuther refused, calling such a move “reverse racism.”

Moreover, contracts between the UAW and the industry prohibited work stoppages of any kind and Reuther meekly acquiesced to company demands such as compulsory overtime, which was far cheaper than hiring additional workers but routinely required employees to work 12 hours a day for six or even seven days a week in noisy, unsafe factories.

For their part, the Big Three agreed to collect union dues directly from the workers’ paychecks, insulating the UAW from dissatisfied employees who might be tempted to withhold their dues payments.

Coupled with his endorsement of Jim Crow practices on the shop floor, Reuther’s no-strike pledge left the ineffective grievance process as the auto workers’ only recourse. By 1970, there were 250,000 written grievances at General Motors alone or one for every two workers employed in production.

My father was injured badly in an on-the-job accident when I was 13, as I recall, and it was around that time when my father told me he had been denied a promotion despite the highest score on a qualifying examination.

When he asked a White supervisor about the promotion weeks later, he was told: “Now Jeter, if I give the job to an—–, we’ll both get fired.”

That gibes with what one White autoworker told filmmakers in the 1973 documentary “Finally Got the News”:

“I took three tests, now one of the math tests I took I didn’t do too well on. The fella who was running the tests said ‘well, I tell you what, you go home and study up on this a little bit and come back and see me in a week.’ I know G-damn well he wasn’t going to tell that to any Colored boy.”

At war with itself for the better part of 70 years, organized labor in the U.S. is virtually obsolete. Only one in 10 workers belong to a union, and wages today account for just 43% of GDP.

Reuther died in a 1970 plane crash but in the last year of his life, African American autoworkers grew so disgruntled that they would hoist placards at wildcat strikes that asserted that UAW stood for “U Ain’t White.”

Vaccination hesitancy among Blacks based on mistrust of an unjust system

Photo courtesy of CDC. “A sharecropper subject of the infamous Tuskegee Study.”

This article first published 9/3/21 by the Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder https://spokesman-recorder.com/2021/09/03/vaccination-hesitancy-among-blacks-based-on-mistrust-of-an-unjust-system/

Good reason to be anxious about what White people are up to’

An Oakland humanities teacher, Craig Donaldson, says his high school students agree on few things so much as their staunch opposition to getting the “jab.” The broad consensus among his mostly African American students—there is a smattering of Latinos and Arabs but no Whites—is to just say “no” when it comes to any of the COVID-19 vaccines on the market.

“The reason is that they just don’t trust the government at all,” said Donaldson, a 52-year-old African American who asked that his real name not be used because he is concerned about retaliation from school administrators. “And they don’t trust big institutions like the medical establishment.

“They think there may be some kind of plan afoot,” said Donaldson. “I am not saying that there is a deep analysis or anything, but a general instinctual mistrust of the system and its intentions towards Black people.”

While he has himself been vaccinated, Donaldson concedes that he shares some of his students’ misgivings. “My girlfriend hassles me about getting [vaccinated],” Donaldson said. “She’s Afrocentric and highly suspicious of Western medicine and into [homeopathic remedies]. Like my students, she believes that there is something more nefarious involved [with the vaccines].”

Donaldson, his girlfriend and his students are hardly outliers in the African American community, but rather representative of a Black body politic that has little faith in White Americans, their institutions, or their medicine. Along with Latinos, Blacks remain the most unvaccinated demographic in the U.S.

According to data compiled by the Kaiser Family Foundation, 72% of American adults have received at least one vaccination dose as of August 16. The racial classifications are known for 58% of those vaccinated, of whom 58 percent are White and 10 percent are Black.

With the Delta variant raging, particularly among the unvaccinated, health care professionals are redoubling their efforts to assuage Black fears about the vaccines. “We know that the vaccine is safe,” said Dr. Michele Benoit-Wilson, an ob-gyn with WakeMed Health in Raleigh, North Carolina, who said she encourages her patients to get vaccinated almost daily.

“There has been no increased risk of miscarriage that has been seen in women who have gotten vaccinated prior to pregnancy or in early pregnancy,” said Benoit-Wilson. “The solution has got to be vaccinating all of us and getting the message out that the vaccine is very safe.”

That does not, however, mean gas-lighting African Americans’ concerns or dismissing them as paranoid, said Dr. Rachel Villanueva, clinical assistant professor of obstetrics and gynecology at New York University’s Grossman School of Medicine. She is president of the National Medical Association, the Black equivalent of the American Medical Association.

History is replete with examples of White physicians brutalizing African Americans rather than healing them, including, most famously, the Tuskegee experiment in which 400 Black sharecroppers were treated with placebos for syphilis rather than the commonly accepted treatment, penicillin. Less well known are the abuses committed by the “father of gynecology,” a 19th century gynecologist named J. Marion Sims who experimented on enslaved women without the benefit of anesthesia.

In 1931, another White doctor, Cornelius Rhoads, studying anemia in Puerto Rico, wrote a letter to a colleague boasting that he had deliberately killed eight patients. Twenty years later, a 31-year old African American mother of five, Henrietta Lacks, complained of vaginal bleeding to doctors at Baltimore’s Johns Hopkins Hospital. Without her consent, doctors donated some of the cancerous tissue collected from Lacks’ cervix to medical researchers.

Ironically, Lacks’ cell line—known as the workhorse of modern biological research—was most recently used in the development of vaccines against COVID-19.

And last year, a 52-year-old African American doctor, Susan Moore, died of COVID-19 after complaining of frustrating exchanges with a White hospitalist at the Indiana University Health system. In one Facebook post shortly before she died, she described the doctor’s refusal to prescribe pain medication for her severe neck pain.

“I was crushed,” a tearful Moore said. “He made me feel like I was a drug addict. And he knew I was a physician. I don’t take narcotics. I was hurting.”

“Our community has deep mistrust of the medical system, and with good reason,” Dr. Villanueva told the MSR. “Blacks are hesitant because they lack confidence in the vaccine. That is understandable. But we think it’s so important to educate and advocate for patients to get vaccinated… It’s important to keep in mind that this isn’t just a Black vaccine; White individuals are getting vaccinated too.”

Across social media channels, Black activists urge Americans to strengthen their immune systems naturally and question why other countries have had success in treating the spread of COVID-19 using traditional medicines or drugs such as Ivermectin. One African American activist in the New York area, Lisa Davis, wrote on Facebook recently:

“It just goes back to my initial premise…that the principles of White Supremacy are deeply embedded in Eurocentric medicine as what is deemed ‘science’ does not acknowledge or even recognize any culture that is not White! But it steals from them.”

The Oakland school teacher, Donaldson, said that unlike many Whites his students are not necessarily averse to wearing masks, suggesting that they aren’t skeptical of the disease itself, but the treatment. “There is such an overall assault on Blackness that we really do have good reason to be anxious about what White people are up to.”

Haiti digs out from another massive earthquake

Photo courtesy of MGN.

This article first published 8/18/21 by the Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder  https://spokesman-recorder.com/2021/08/18/haiti-digs-out-from-another-massive-earthquake/

Island nation, diaspora determined to overcome latest natural disaster

Hours after a 7.2 magnitude earthquake rattled the Caribbean Saturday morning August 14, social media was abuzz with Haitians in the U.S. and Canada offering to pitch in and lend a hand to the relief effort.

“Hello ladies,” began one Facebook post. “[Are] there any nurses, doctors, volunteers, who want to go help in Haiti [?] I’m down for it. Haiti needs our help right now.”

“I’m down. For like a week or two,” wrote one of the respondents.

“I’m interested.” wrote another.

“Let’s go Haiti need[s] us,” responded a third.

“Is it possible to Zoom meeting to discuss how we can help Haiti [?]” one woman posted in her Facebook group.

As of Sunday, Haiti’s Civil Protection agency had counted almost 1,300 dead and 30,000 injured in the country’s southwest corner near the earthquake’s epicenter. More than 1,000 homes, seven churches, two hotels and three schools have been destroyed.

The devastation, of course, comes only five weeks after gunmen burst into Haiti’s presidential palace and assassinated President Jovenel Moïse.

But if the myriad catastrophes have left the Haitian diaspora feeling what Western psychologists refer to as “compassion fatigue”—an indifference to charitable appeals resulting from the frequency of pleas for help—there are no outward signs of emotional burnout. Rather, resiliency seems to be the default position among Haitians, both at home and abroad, who are heirs to a complicated legacy of struggle and perseverance that includes the first successful slave revolt in history.

“There’s a collective feeling of being overwhelmed, but we’re pushing through it,” said Nedjhy Dominique, a 42-year-old Haitian-born American who lives in South Florida. “The sense of community is our strongest connection.

“I spoke with my cousin today, and she’s already trying to figure out how to temporarily house those left homeless in the southern part of the county by creating a network of host families who have rental properties there and are willing to allow them to stay there for at least 30 days at no charge,” said Dominique.

“A friend of mine has already spoken with her employer—a medical supply manufacturing company—and has them agreeing to donate $50,000 worth of medical equipment. We’re resourceful.”

That is largely by necessity, however, says Dominique and other Haitians who contend that funds raised by the international community for Haitian relief efforts tend to disappear. When an earthquake measuring 7.0 on the Richter scale struck just west of Haiti’s capital city of Port-Au-Prince in 2010, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was appointed by Congressional lawmakers to oversee $4.4 billion in disaster relief.

Her husband, former President Bill Clinton, was named co-chair of a government committee tasked with formulating spending priorities. Despite the Clintons’ promises to jumpstart Haiti’s economy, however, critics say that the largest post-earthquake project—a $300 million, 600-acre industrial park on the country’s northern coast—is nothing more than an amalgam of foreign-owned sweatshops that produce cheap clothing for consumers in the U.S.

Similarly, executives with the International Red Cross claim that with the $500 million in charitable donations it raised following the 2010 earthquake, the agency provided housing to 130,000 displaced Haitians. But a 2015 investigation by National Public Radio and ProPublica found that the charity had only built six homes.

“Five hundred million in Haiti is a lot of money,” Jean-Max Bellerive, Haiti’s prime minister in 2010, told NPR. “I’m not a big mathematician, but I can make some additions. It doesn’t add up for me.”

“A lot of the people who are trying to get help to those in Haiti are very clear on their distrust of the Red Cross and other organizations with a proven track record of squandering resources and money meant to serve those in need,” said Dominique. “We aren’t just waiting to be saved; if that were the case we’d die waiting.”

In total, the United Nations reported that non-governmental organizations, U.S. tax dollars, and charities worldwide raised $13 billion for relief following Haiti’s 2010 earthquake. Yet the yawning gap between that figure and daily life for 10 million Haitians living in the poorest country in the Western hemisphere left many Haitian Americans ambivalent about Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential run.

Trump campaigned heavily in South Florida’s Haitian community during the campaign alleging that “Friends of Bill” Clinton received sweetheart contracts from the ex-president and his wife. Trump won the state by a slim margin in 2016.

Haitian authorities Sunday declared a state of emergency and said they had no preliminary tally of those missing after Saturday’s earthquake. Hospitals in Haiti are at full capacity, and the Health Ministry asked people to donate blood.

“The needs are enormous,” Prime Minister Ariel Henry told reporters. “We must take care of the injured and fractured, but also provide food, aid, temporary shelter and psychological support.”

In a Facebook chat this weekend, another Haitian American echoed concerns that Haitians could not wait on international assistance: “Please count me in. Let’s use our strength in numbers to help Haiti. Hopefully, the mistakes of 2010 will not be replicated as an influx of funds earmarked for rebuilding efforts poured in from all over the globe yet not much had changed.

“We need to brainstorm ways to help the communities affected by the earthquake and raise funds to do so,” the post continued. “A small donation of $1 per person would be helpful…There must be accountability for any funds or goods donated for these people cannot be preyed on as is often the case with ‘us’.”

Racism, patriarchy taint Japan Olympics

Photo NBC Sports / YouTube / MGN. “Track and field star Sha’Carri Richardson”

This article first published 7/21/21 by the Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder  https://spokesman-recorder.com/2021/08/13/july-job-report-plenty-of-jobs-but-for-low-wages/

The suspensions of several high-profile Black female athletes from the Olympic Games that begin in Tokyo this week have raised questions about racism and patriarchy in sports, and perhaps even more troubling, who is a woman, and who decides?

Earlier this month, the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency suspended the sprinter Sha’Carri Richardson for 30 days for a positive marijuana test after she won first place in the 100-meter dash at the Olympic trials with a time of 10.86. Richardson, who is African American and self-identifies as queer, acknowledged that she did indeed smoke marijuana to help her cope with grief after learning of the death of her mother.

But the timing of the ban struck many on social media as suspicious and seems more like an assertion of control over Black women’s bodies in an effort to insulate White women athletes from competition. Richardson’s defenders noted that research consistently shows that marijuana does not enhance athletic performance.

Activist and writer Laura Schleifer, who is White, told the MSR that the message sent to Black women is, “Do not outdo White women, who of course have never, ever had an unfair advantage themselves in life. Never.”

More problematic than Richardson’s suspension, however, is a decision by World Athletics—the international governing body that includes track and field-related sports—to ban the South African middle-distance runner Caster Semenya from Olympic competition unless she agrees to take drugs, or undergoes surgery, to suppress her testosterone level. The winner of two gold medals in the 800-meters at London in 2012 and Rio de Janeiro in 2016, Caster has repeatedly refused to do either, but earlier this month Switzerland’s Federal Supreme Court denied her appeal.

At issue is an assertion by World Athletics that it has a right to enforce a rule limiting the amount of testosterone female athletes competing in the women’s 400m to 1,500m events can have. Semenya’s natural testosterone levels reportedly surpass that threshold. The ruling effectively means she cannot defend her gold medal in the 800 meters in Tokyo.

“I am very disappointed by this ruling, but refuse to let World Athletics drug me or stop me from being who I am,” Caster Semenya said in a statement. “Excluding female athletes or endangering our health solely because of our natural abilities puts World Athletics on the wrong side of history.”

“I will continue to fight for the human rights of female athletes, both on the track and off the track, until we can all run free the way we were born,” Semenya said. “I know what is right and will do all I can to protect basic human rights for young girls everywhere.”

Several other Black female athletes have experienced similar setbacks, including runners Christine Mboma and Beatrice Maslingi, both from Namibia. They have been ruled ineligible to compete in the women’s 400-meter sprints based on their natural testosterone levels. The two will be able to compete in the 200-meter race, however.

Scheifler and others see the testosterone limits as an attack on transgender athletes, and Black transgender athletes specifically, even though Semenya and the two Namibian runners are not transgender.

“All of a sudden they are obsessing over women’s ‘hormone levels’ in ways they never would have before, and that’s likely because of the attention that the anti-trans panic has brought to the whole subject of how hormones might influence athletics,” said Scheifler, who promotes both racial justice and trans rights in her advocacy work.

“I also see big-time echoes of eugenics in this, and of Black women being forcibly sterilized. And racist tropes about Black women being ‘hyperfertile.’ and having ‘superhuman strength.’” She said there is a long, disgusting history of White people being obsessed with controlling Black women’s hormones.

The history of anti-Black racism in sports as it affects Black male athletes is rather well-known. White lawmakers managed to drive the invincible African American boxer Jack Johnson from the ring by convicting him on charges of transporting a woman—his own wife—across state lines for “immoral purposes.”

When African American sprinters Tommy Smith and John Carlos raised their black-gloved fists in a Black Power salute at the 1968 Olympic Games, Avery Brundage, president of the International Olympic Committee, suspended them from the U.S. team. And the NCAA banned the dunk after the all-Black Texas Western College defeated the all-White University of Kentucky in the 1966 championship game.

But women, generally, and African American women specifically, experience discrimination differently, because they are often exploited for both their labor and their sexuality. The ghost of Sarah Baartman—a South African woman paraded around Europe as a freak show in the early 19th century by French and British captors who named her the Venus Hottentot—looms large over the debate about the Olympics.

Ben Carrington, a sociologist who focuses on issues of race and culture, wrote in a tweet that the many challenges Black athletes are experiencing at the Olympics underscore a gross imbalance of power.

“Hoping those upset by the Sha’Carri Richardson situation become aware of the power of WADA [the World Anti-Doping Association] and those following Caster Semenya and the other women banned focus attention on the IAAF [World Athletics]. Sport is about power; not the ‘power’ on the field but the power to decide who plays and who doesn’t.”

Sending her support to Semenya, the U.S. gymnast Simone Biles, who has also struggled with racial double standards in her sport, tweeted: “This is wrong on so many levels. Once again men having control over women’s bodies. I’m tired.”

Haiti in turmoil after president’s assassination

Photo MGN.

This article first published 7/14/21 by the Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder  https://spokesman-recorder.com/2021/07/14/haiti-in-turmoil-after-presidents-assassination/

Many suspect U.S meddling

Widely viewed as a puppet of the United States, Haiti’s President Jovenel Moïse was unpopular both among Haitians on the island and those who left. Still, the news of his assassination last week left Jacqueline Pierre-Paul, a 41-year-old Haitian American woman who lives in South Florida, overwhelmed with grief.

“In fact, I’m in tears now again for at least the tenth time in two days,” she told the MSR in a weekend interview. “I didn’t agree with his politics and the way he ran the country…[but] like many others I didn’t want him out this way. He was still our president, who was the head of a sovereign nation.”

But for all of her life, and that of her father and her father’s father dating back to President Woodrow Wilson’s decision to invade Haiti in 1915, the United States’ fingerprints are all over the Haitian body politic. And so Pierre-Paul experienced an emotion other than grief after learning of Moïse’s murder: rage.

Related story: Slain Haitian president faced calls for resignation, sustained mass protests before killing

“This type of chaos does nothing to improve the lives of my people,” said Pierre-Paul, who asked not to be identified by her real name for fear that it might jeopardize relatives in Haiti. “In fact, it opens the doors for more grifters, occupation, tyranny, and danger.

“The only ones who stand to gain from this are the same people who always have. My people are angry and we should be. The White saviors need to stay out of this.”

If social media and emigres such as Pierre-Paul are to be believed, Moïse’s assassination is not much of a whodunit on the Haitian street that stretches from Paris to Port Au-Prince, City Soleil to South Florida, and Bainet to Brooklyn. Despite adamant denials from the U.S. State Department, it is an article of faith for many Haitians that the U.S. bears some responsibility for the crack commando squad that stormed the presidential palace on the night of July 7. They tortured Moïse before opening fire on him and his wife, Martine, who was critically injured but survived the assault.

There is virtually no concrete evidence to support such accusations, but the U.S. does have a long criminal rap sheet in Haiti, which is the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere. Home to the first successful slave revolt in history, Haiti declared its independence from France in 1804.

But 21 years later, Napoleon demanded that the former slave colony repay France 150 million francs—10 times the amount the U.S. had paid for the Louisiana territory—as reparations. Banks in the U.S. were among those that loaned Haitians the money to meet their debt obligations.

When it looked as though Haiti might default, Wilson’s Secretary of State, William Jennings Bryan, deployed the Marines, putatively to protect U.S. citizens from civil unrest. Their real mission was to withdraw $500,000 from Haiti’s national bank.

In Haiti’s bicentennial year, 2004, President Jean Bertrand Aristide appealed to the international community for $22 billion in reparations; that same year, George W. Bush drove Aristide from office in what Aristide referred to as a coup d’etat. Seven years later, the Obama administration blocked the exiled Aristide’s return to Haiti to run for public office. He was the county’s most popular politician at the time.

The Obama administration’s choice to lead Haiti that year was Michel Martelly, a musician with no previous political experience. As president, Martelly—known as “Sweet Micky—dissolved Haiti’s parliament, reinstated the country’s military, and brokered deals with international businessmen and the Clinton Foundation that many Haitians would come to characterize as “corrupt.” Indeed, as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton pressured Martelly to block a raise in the minimum wage for sweatshop workers.

Moïse was Martelly’s handpicked successor. In a YouTube video, last weekend, the Haitian-American human rights lawyer and activist Èzili Dantò repeated the widespread rumor that Haiti’s oligarchy of mixed-race businessmen targeted the president for assassination because he was cutting deals with foreign investors that squeezed them out of the picture.

Just recently, he met with investors in Turkey, which has a close relationship to Russia. Dantò and others surmised that this could not have made the Biden administration happy, as it ratchets up tensions with America’s Cold War rival.

“Guess who are responsible for Michelle Martelly?” said Danto. “It was Obama, Hillary Clinton…[Ambassador] Cheryl Mills, Susan Rice. Biden was the vice president. These people are responsible right now for the death of Jovenal Moise because without putting Martelly in the presidency Jovenal wouldn’t have been in the presidency and a lot of Haitians wouldn’t have died.”

Haitian police said on Sunday they had arrested one of the men suspected of organizing a unit of assassins formed of 26 Colombians and two Haitian Americans. National Police Chief Leon Charles told a news conference that 63-year-old Christian Emmanuel Sanon flew to Haiti on a private jet in early June accompanied by hired security guards. He had planned to take over as president.

Dantò and others don’t completely buy it, noting that Colombia and its conservative government is a client of the U.S. and that the assassination bore all the markings of a CIA false flag operation and a mob hit. Moise’s eyes were reportedly gouged out before he was fatally shot.

Said Dantò of the Biden administration’s commitment to assist Haiti in its investigation: “Haiti…needs no more help from the United States.”

Critical race theory backlash would keep the truth hidden

This article first published 6/23/21 by the Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder  https://spokesman-recorder.com/2021/06/23/critical-race-theory-backlash-would-keep-the-truth-hidden/

When she taught at a prestigious Detroit prep school, Whitney Larkin would devote the first three weeks of her U.S. history course to an exploration of the Indigenous societies that preceded the arrival of the first European settlers. The textbook used by the class before Larkin began teaching the course glossed over this material in half a page, and the African American teacher thought it important that students learn about the pyramids of the ancient cities of Teotihuacan and the Cahokia, in addition to the Boston Tea Party.

“I want students to be clear that Indigenous peoples had highly complex societies that in many ways were superior to European ones. I go into great detail to emphasize this was not a barren, unpopulated land of hunter savages,” explained Larkin.

She said that while she was teaching the U.S. Constitution, a White student from an upper middle-class family responded to a question thusly: “The Constitution was written by old rich White men for old rich White men to keep them in power.”

Larkin responded, “I said, ‘Mic drop! My job here is done!’”

Some of the students’ parents, on the other hand, were not so keen about what their children were learning, and a coterie requested a meeting with Larkin and the dean of students. Larkin remembers meeting with three couples, although only the men spoke. When, they all asked, was she planning to teach “real” history?

“When I responded about White men’s history,” said Larkin, “they were shocked into silence.”

She was fired six months later.

Larkin’s experience four years ago shines a light on recent efforts to ban the teaching of critical race theory (CRT) in schools. Created by legal scholars in the 1980s, critical race theory posits that only institutionalized racism can explain the persistence of profound racial disparities in the workplace, education, political representation, household wealth and health outcomes nearly two generation’s after the Civil Rights Movement. As of this month, 25 states—including two Minnesota border states, Iowa and Wisconsin—have introduced legislation to regulate how teachers can discuss racism and sexism in the classroom.

But as Larkin and other educators point out, critical race theory is really just a proxy battle in a much larger war over dueling narratives, one that accounts for the suffering of People of Color, women, and the poor, and another that absolves those who are responsible for that suffering.

“I certainly teach critical race theory,” Ariela Gross, a law professor at the University of Southern California told the MSR. “I want our students to have active debate. I don’t really see racism as individual prejudice. Individualizing it, we can let ourselves off the hook.”

As have many others, Gross noted that few, if any, elementary or high schools teach critical race theory, nor is it widely taught at U.S. colleges and universities. “That’s telling,” said Gross.

She compared the backlash against critical race theory to efforts by White politicians in the 1960s to rally the troops, as it were, to crush any challenge to their privileges in the workplace, education and banking. She refers to proposals to crack down on critical race theory as “education suppression” that is motivated by the same White insecurities as voter suppression efforts that are gaining momentum in the post-Trump era.

“Most of the people who are passing these laws have no idea what CRT actually is. We often talk about ‘waving the bloody shirt’ when White southerners wanted to get White people riled up and appeal to their racism and remind them of the Civil War.”

Whites, by-and-large, have always feared both the leveling effects of education and any vehicle by which the European settler project might be exposed for what it is: a racist colonization effort. Between 1865 and the mid-1870s, vigilante mobs set fire to scores of Freedmen’s schools, which were the precursor to universal public education. And many school districts across the South continue to refer to the Civil War as the “war of Northern aggression.”

Alternately, African Americans’ enthusiasm for “book learnin’” is the cornerstone of every Black social movement dating back to slavery. One administrator for the Freedmen’s Bureau—the federal agency responsible for managing the Reconstruction effort—compared Blacks’ support for public schools to a type of derangement, so “crazed” were they to learn.

A newly freed slave in Mississippi proclaimed, “If I nebber does nothing more while I live, I shall give my children a chance to go to school, for I considers education [the] next best ting to liberty.”

The tension between searching for truth and obscuring it is at the root of the debate over critical race theory. “This fight [over critical race theory] is more about the imagined feelings of White children learning the facts of history,” said Gross “There should be nothing taught that makes White children feel like they are racist or White Supremacists. It’s ironic because it’s being pushed by people on the side of the political spectrum who complain that their free speech is being limited.”

The timing is particularly troubling. The combination of the first African American president, Barack Obama, and a Great Recession that worsened the gap between the 99% and the wealthiest one percent, has deepened White anxiety, resulting in violence such as the January 6 attack on Capitol Hill. A broader public debate could help curb those violent impulses.

“It’s really dangerous when we start to shut down that history,” explained Gross.

Juneteenth: a tribute to Blacks’ unflinching will to be free

Photo: MGN. “Emancipation day celebration – later known as Juneteenth, Photo Date: 1/19/1900”

This article first published 6/23/21 by the Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder https://spokesman-recorder.com/2021/06/23/critical-race-theory-backlash-would-keep-the-truth-hidden/

As the story is usually told, the secular holiday known as Juneteenth began two months after the end of a bloody, four-year Civil War, when General Gordon Granger and 2,000 Union soldiers disembarked at Galveston Island, Texas in mid-June of 1865 and made a horrific discovery:

Chattel slavery was still very much alive in Galveston.

Days later, Granger read five General Orders issued by the federal government, the third of which declared: “The people of Texas are informed that, in accordance with a proclamation from the Executive of the United States, all slaves are free.”

The news of their liberation was akin to a thunderclap. The streets of Galveston exploded in spasms of cathartic joy; men hurled their hats into the air, women danced, the elderly wept.

This bacchanal on June 19th—the name inspired by merging the two words mimicking African Americans’ rapid-fire cadence—inspired the holiday that has been celebrated virtually every year since across the nation at backyard barbecues, block parties, town squares and city parks. In 1872 a group of African American ministers and businessmen purchased 10 acres of land in Houston and created Emancipation Park to host the annual Juneteenth celebration.

But the widely-publicized spate of killings of African Americans by White police and vigilantes—including Michael Brown, Eric Garner, Tamir Rice, Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud Arbery and, here in Minnesota, Philando Castille, George Floyd and most recently Daunte Wright—has shone an even brighter spotlight on Juneteenth and sparked a reconsideration of the holiday as something more than just a cultural touchstone or street festival celebrating Black culture.

Related Story: A snapshot of Juneteenth events in the Twin Cities and beyond (updated)

What is often left unsaid in the retelling of Juneteenth’s origins is that it was not the product of liberal, White benevolence but Blacks’ political agency and unflinching will for self-determination. Among the Union troops who accompanied Granger to Texas were a contingent of colored troops from New York and Illinois who were livid when they discovered the continuing exploitation of slaves.

They approached Granger and told him in no uncertain terms that either he would do something about the situation or they would.

“One of the tropes about American life is that Black people didn’t fight for our freedom,” said Robert S. Smith, a history professor at Marquette University and the director of the Center for Urban Research, Teaching and Outreach. “The truth is that there is no union victory without very clear and robust engagement by Black people in the abolition of slavery.”

As noted by several historians—most notably W.E.B. DuBois—one of the factors that influenced Lincoln to sign the Emancipation Proclamation was that “slaves had started to act free anyway,” Smith said, by sabotaging the owners’ crops, organizing work slowdowns or sit-down strikes on the plantation, or simply walking off the job headed North.

In the year that followed Juneteenth, Blacks began to build Black institutions and communities and reassembled families that had been scattered to the winds by slavery. The system of White terror that began to emerge in 1877 after federal troops withdrew from the former Confederate states undermined Black progress that Whites saw as a threat, Smith said.

This foreshadowed the financial terrorism of the banks that pilfered the wealth of Black homeowners after the collapse of the subprime mortgage market, which saddled African Americans with predatory loans. The result is that homeownership is at record lows; about 44 percent of African American households own their home compared to 77 percent of Whites.

The irony is that Blacks today own no larger stake in the U.S. than they did when General Grangers’ troops arrived in Galveston 166 years ago. The question increasingly confronting African Americans today is how to summon the same ferocity, resilience, courage, and improvisation of the colored Union troops who dared deliver their ultimatum to General Granger.

More municipalities, institutions, and workplaces than ever before are recognizing Juneteenth this year, and many are giving employees Friday, June 3 a day off. The Movement for Black Lives Matter has called for June 19th to be made a national holiday, which was finally realized with Congresss’ passage of the Juneteenth National Independence Day Act on Wednesday. President Biden’s signed it into law on Thursday.

Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont also called for it to become a national holiday in 2019 when he recognized Opal Lee, an activist in Fort Worth who campaigned for a Juneteenth holiday.  The work of Lee and the late Congressman Al Edwards, who also pushed for the holiday, was recognized when the bill was passed in the House on Wednesday evening. “This has been a long journey with the work of our fellow Texans, the late Representative Al Edwards, and Opal Lee,” Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee stated.

Mark Anthony Neal, a professor of African American studies at Duke University, told the New York Times: “I think Juneteenth feels a little different now. It’s an opportunity for folks to kind of catch their breath about what has been this incredible pace of change and shifting that we’ve seen over the last couple of weeks.”

Ann Jeffreyes, a retiree and African American activist who attended Juneteenth celebrations when she lived in New York City and plans to attend events in the Bay area this year, said that Juneteenth is a vivid reminder that African Americans are far from the helpless victims they are often portrayed as in both the news and entertainment media.

“Through the most brutal form of slavery…our ancestors still celebrated life and plotted at the same time,” said Jeffreyes. “So yes, [Juneteenth] keeps us connected to our ancestors’ courage and persistence, resilience.”

George Floyd did—and—did not change the world

Photo: Chris Juhn/MSR News. “Thousands of protesters march down Hiawatha Avenue on their way to the 3rd Precinct in Minneapolis. / Chris Juhn”

This article first published 5/24/21 by the Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder https://spokesman-recorder.com/2021/05/24/how-george-floyd-changed-the-world/

Reflections of a veteran journalist

Wearing “Black Lives Matter” t-shirts and carrying a placard that read “Standing in
Solidarity,” protesters poured into the streets of Camden, New Jersey just days after a White
Minneapolis police officer cavalierly asphyxiated with his knee an unarmed Black man, George
Floyd.

In a country riven by race, it came as a surprise when a Camden police officer approached
one of the rally’s principal organizers, an African American mother of three named Yolanda
Deaver, to ask an impassioned question:
“Can I join you?”

“Absolutely” was Deaver’s response, and before long one Camden police officer was joined
by another and another until finally the police chief, Joseph D. Wysocki, asked to join. He
eventually posed for a photograph with Deaver and other protesters that went viral.

And so it came to pass that this impoverished city on the banks of the Delaware River
doubled down on an experiment in police reform. In the year since Floyd’s murder, violent crime
in Camden has declined at a time when violent crime rates nationwide are rising. Citizens’
complaints about excessive use of force have plummeted, and police officers regularly attend
barbecues, block parties, and recreation league basketball games.

Addressing budget concerns, City officials voted in 2012 to abolish Camden’s police force,
enabling it to be absorbed by the larger county agency. But this did little to defuse tensions in the
mostly Black city of 77,000. Only in the last year, since police joined hands with protesters, has
the City begun to really drill down on de-escalation techniques and improve relations with the
community.

The Camden County police remain a work-in-progress, but it has started a genuine dialogue
between the people and law enforcement. Kimberly Mutcherson, the co-dean of Rutgers-
Camden Law School pointed out, “one thing that’s interesting about Camden is that there was,
from the beginning, a police department and chief who recognized that the protesters, the people
out there, their cause is righteous.”

The murder of George Floyd on a street corner in South Minneapolis a year ago this week
has changed everything in America, and it has changed absolutely nothing.

There are encouraging signs that elected officials and policymakers are at least beginning to
listen to African American communities that have been under siege for the better part of the last
century. Yet there are at least as many signs of stasis and a State that has every intention of
continuing to terrorize Blacks.

Three hundred and twenty miles due south of Camden, protesters in Elizabeth City, North
Carolina entered a fourth week of demonstrations to demand that charges be filed against
Pasquotank County police officers who fatally shot an unarmed Black motorist, Andrew Brown
Jr., during a warrant search last month. The district attorney announced last week that the
shooting was justified, and that Brown’s attempts to escape represented an imminent threat to the
officers.

Lawyers for Brown’s family contend that Brown made every effort to elude the officers, not
attack them, and that firing into a moving vehicle violates the police department’s own
regulations.

Six days after Brown was fatally shot in the back of the head, an international panel of
experts and jurists from Africa, the Caribbean, Asia, Latin America and Europe issued a report
concluding that the systematic police killings of Black people in the U.S. constitutes a prima
facie case of crimes against humanity. The 12 rapporteurs appealed to the prosecutor of the
International Criminal Court, or ICC, to investigate responsible police officials, yet neither the
White House nor the U.S. Congress has responded to the report.

The killing of George Floyd on a South Minneapolis street corner a year ago has changed
everything, and it has changed nothing.

‘School hesitancy’ slows classroom re-openings

Photo: Photo by Ralston Smith on Unsplash.

This article first published 5/21/21 by the Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder  https://spokesman-recorder.com/2021/05/21/school-hesitancy-slows-classroom-re-openings/

Many Black parents resist a return to education as usual

Melissa Elayne was a bit relieved when the pandemic’s first wave shut down her 13-year-old daughter’s suburban Philadelphia school. The environment there was not especially conducive to learning, especially for African American children.

There was the school police officer who once gave Elayne’s daughter detention for dancing with friends in the lunchroom. There were the students and teachers who touched her hair without permission. There was even one White classmate who had taken to using the “n” word, and with a hard “r” at that.

The virtual classroom was no better. Already battling a short attention span, Elayne’s daughter was bored to tears by the robotic online instruction provided by unimaginative teachers and an inflexible curriculum that failed to engage students by connecting lesson plans to nationwide protests against police brutality or a once-in-a-lifetime public health crisis. When her daughter didn’t respond in chat sessions or turn on her camera, a few teachers logged her out of the virtual classroom and even threatened to fine Elayne for her daughter’s attendance.

“We found the virtual school environment to be hostile,” Elayne said in an interview. “There was just a lot of antipathy… None of her friends were in any of her classes, so there were no opportunities for the camaraderie which often makes school tolerable. I feel like they did a terrible job of lessening the kids’ isolation, which I’m positive was much worse for Black children.”

As a result Elayne decided to homeschool her daughter this year, and while she wouldn’t describe the transition as seamless, her daughter is excited about learning and getting the kind of quality education that the ironically named Colonial School District has long denied her.

This Philadelphia household is one of millions of Black and Latino households that have chosen not to return their children to schools that have reopened following the COVID-19 pandemic. While a federal survey indicates that only one-in-10 elementary and middle schools remain closed nationwide—and a similar number of high schools—a majority of Black, Latino and Asian American students remain out of school.

There is no single reason for this. One is that many teenagers from low-income families have found jobs to help their parents who have lost jobs or had their hours drastically cut. “I wanted to take the stress off my mom,” 18-year-old Pauline Rojas told the New York Times. She is taking courses online but working a job in fast-food and has no plans to return to her San Antonio high school.

“I’m no longer a kid,” she said. “I’m capable of having a job, holding a job, and making my own money.”

Additionally, parents who made new child care arrangements to tide them through the worst of the pandemic are reluctant to disrupt new routines that have worked relatively well for them. There are even reports that the language barrier has left some Latino parents in the dark about school re-openings.

But at base, the pandemic has led many parents of color to reevaluate the mostly White school districts that seem far more interested in controlling their children than educating them. Scholars have taken to referring to urban schools as “sites of suffering” to describe the harassment, bullying, and even physical violence visited upon schoolchildren of color by police, teachers and administrators.

Beginning with the Clinton administration’s efforts to privatize schools, successive federal educational reforms have deepened the Black community’s reservoir of mistrust that dates back to the Reconstruction era and the doctrine of “separate but equal” public resources. Black students are suspended or expelled at three times the rate of their White classmates.

While African Americans account for nearly 13 percent of the U.S. population, they represent only 6.7 percent of all teachers, underscoring the view embraced by many Blacks that their children are being taught by their enemies. In his iconic autobiography, Malcolm X wrote of the White teacher at his all-White school in Mason, Michigan who scoffed at his ambition to one day be a lawyer, telling the president of his seventh-grade class to instead consider a career in carpentry.

Experts have coined the term “school hesitancy” to describe families rejecting traditional learning models. In Washington, D.C., families in the poorest ward turned down offers for a spot in their local elementary school at twice the rate of families in the wealthiest ward, according to city data. As a result, schools in wealthier wards are back to maximum capacity while seats remain empty in the poorest neighborhoods in the city’s southeast quadrant, sparking a debate over whether resources are best spent on in-person or online learning.

Some experts worry that Black students might fall farther behind—especially in mathematics—with students on average likely to lose five to nine months of learning by the end of this school year. Students of Color could fall six to 12 months behind, compared with four to eight months for White students.

But Elayne has seized on the opportunity to homeschool. The Colonial school district has a good reputation, but Elayne notes that neither her daughter nor her older son had a Black teacher. In consultation with her daughter, she has retooled her curriculum to include the illustrated version of Karl Marx’s famous tome “Capital.” The school district requires that homeschoolers’ curriculum include some Pennsylvania state history, and “so we’re studying the Indigenous people from this area,” Elayne said.

Math continues to be her daughter’s weakest subject, but overall the educational experience so far has been a positive one. Said Elayne: “It’s been fun.”

Homelessness grows as globalization boosts housing costs

Photo: Chris Jun.

This article first published 5/14/21 by the Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder. https://spokesman-recorder.com/2021/05/14/homelessness-grows-as-globalization-boosts-housing-costs/

Reflections of a veteran journalist

Wearing “Black Lives Matter” t-shirts and carrying a placard that read “Standing in
Solidarity,” protesters poured into the streets of Camden, New Jersey just days after a White
Minneapolis police officer cavalierly asphyxiated with his knee an unarmed Black man, George
Floyd.

In a country riven by race, it came as a surprise when a Camden police officer approached
one of the rally’s principal organizers, an African American mother of three named Yolanda
Deaver, to ask an impassioned question:
“Can I join you?”

“Absolutely” was Deaver’s response, and before long one Camden police officer was joined
by another and another until finally the police chief, Joseph D. Wysocki, asked to join. He
eventually posed for a photograph with Deaver and other protesters that went viral.

And so it came to pass that this impoverished city on the banks of the Delaware River
doubled down on an experiment in police reform. In the year since Floyd’s murder, violent crime
in Camden has declined at a time when violent crime rates nationwide are rising. Citizens’
complaints about excessive use of force have plummeted, and police officers regularly attend
barbecues, block parties, and recreation league basketball games.

Addressing budget concerns, City officials voted in 2012 to abolish Camden’s police force,
enabling it to be absorbed by the larger county agency. But this did little to defuse tensions in the
mostly Black city of 77,000. Only in the last year, since police joined hands with protesters, has
the City begun to really drill down on de-escalation techniques and improve relations with the
community.

The Camden County police remain a work-in-progress, but it has started a genuine dialogue
between the people and law enforcement. Kimberly Mutcherson, the co-dean of Rutgers-
Camden Law School pointed out, “one thing that’s interesting about Camden is that there was,
from the beginning, a police department and chief who recognized that the protesters, the people
out there, their cause is righteous.”

The murder of George Floyd on a street corner in South Minneapolis a year ago this week
has changed everything in America, and it has changed absolutely nothing.

There are encouraging signs that elected officials and policymakers are at least beginning to
listen to African American communities that have been under siege for the better part of the last
century. Yet there are at least as many signs of stasis and a State that has every intention of
continuing to terrorize Blacks.

Three hundred and twenty miles due south of Camden, protesters in Elizabeth City, North
Carolina entered a fourth week of demonstrations to demand that charges be filed against
Pasquotank County police officers who fatally shot an unarmed Black motorist, Andrew Brown
Jr., during a warrant search last month. The district attorney announced last week that the
shooting was justified, and that Brown’s attempts to escape represented an imminent threat to the
officers.

Lawyers for Brown’s family contend that Brown made every effort to elude the officers, not
attack them, and that firing into a moving vehicle violates the police department’s own
regulations.

Six days after Brown was fatally shot in the back of the head, an international panel of
experts and jurists from Africa, the Caribbean, Asia, Latin America and Europe issued a report
concluding that the systematic police killings of Black people in the U.S. constitutes a prima
facie case of crimes against humanity. The 12 rapporteurs appealed to the prosecutor of the
International Criminal Court, or ICC, to investigate responsible police officials, yet neither the
White House nor the U.S. Congress has responded to the report.

The killing of George Floyd on a South Minneapolis street corner a year ago has changed
everything, and it has changed nothing.